Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Alarming Number of Whiplash Patients Still Disabled



Alarming Number of Whiplash Patients Still Disabled

If you’ve been injured in a car accident, you may wonder “How soon can I expect to return to work and my normal life?” While the answer to that question is highly individualized, a new study suggests that patients with whiplash-associated disorder may have slower return-to-work rates compared to people with other musculoskeletal injuries.
A study published in the journal BMC Public Health found that only 44% of whiplash patients had returned to work after two years, compared to 57% of patients with other musculoskeletal disorders.
An estimated 19-60% of patients with whiplash still experience symptoms six months after the injury, and up to half of WAD patients fail to return to work within a year. Researchers from Denmark sought to see whether these high rates of chronicity affected return-to-work rates in whiplash patients. The study included 104 adults with whiplash and 3,204 individuals with other musculoskeletal disorders like back pain. All the participants had been listed for sick leave for at least eight weeks prior to the start of the study. The researchers conducted follow-ups at 26 weeks, one year, two years, and three years after the patients were initially listed for sick leave.
Whiplash Study Results:
Patients with other musculoskeletal disorders returned to work sooner than those with whiplash-associated disorder.
Return to Work Whiplash Other Musculoskeletal Disorders
Week 26 18% 43%
1 year 34% 51%
2 years 44% 57%
3 years 43% 57%
With 56% of whiplash patients still on sick leave after two years, the results from this study are higher than what has been found in earlier studies. For instance, a 2001 study showed that only 12% of whiplash patients hadn’t resumed their normal activities or were only back to modified job functions a year after the initial injuries. This difference may have been due to the fact the newer Danish study included a cohort of long-term sick-listed patients who already had a higher risk of chronicity, whereas the 2001 study analyzed a broader group of patients within two days after visiting the emergency room for whiplash. Still, the research shows that individuals with chronic whiplash symptoms, the risk of long-term work disability is great.
“These findings suggest that an active rehabilitation is important to sick-listed individuals with WAD at an early stage of the process,” the researchers wrote. Active rehabilitation, such as chiropractic care and exercise therapies, can improve patients’ chance of recovery.

References
Biering-Sørensen, et al. The return-to-work process of individuals sick-listed because of whiplash-associated disorder: a three-year follow-up study in a Danish cohort of
long-term sickness absentees. BMC Public Health 2014; 14:113 doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-113.
Kasch H, Bach FW, Jensen TS: Handicap after acute whiplash injury: a 1-year prospective study of risk factors. Neurology 2001, 56:1637–1643.

Friday, February 14, 2014

A Chiropractic Systematic Approach to Treating Back Pain.




Low back pain is the single leading cause of disability worldwide, according to the Global Burden of Disease 2010.   In fact, 31 million Americans experience low-back pain at any given time1 and one-half of all working Americans admit to having back pain symptoms each year.2 Back pain is one of the most common reasons for missed work and is the second most common reason for visits to the doctor’s office, outnumbered only by upper-respiratory infections.  Most cases of back pain are mechanical or non-organic—meaning they are not caused by serious conditions, such as inflammatory arthritis, infection, fracture or cancer.3  Experts estimate that Up to 84 percent of adults have low back pain at some time in their lives.4,5
Fortunately, most episodes of back pain resolve with time: approximately 50% of patients will experience back pain relief within two weeks and 90% within three months.  While most episodes of back pain are self-limited, 5% to 10% of cases will become chronic (i.e., long-lasting and recurrent). Chronic back pain accounts for 90% of the healthcare expenditures for back pain and amounts to $50 to $80 billion dollars annually. 6
This discussion will focus on how a multidisciplinary chiropractic practice (Pain Relief Centre) will approach to the initial evaluation of a patient presenting with back pain.

CLINICAL EVALUATION — 

History of Present Illness (HPI)/Chief Complaint(CC)

Obtaining an accurate history is the critical first step in determining the etiology of a patient's problem.  The patient initiates this process by describing their symptoms and what caused them.  The patient's reason for presenting to the clinician is usually referred to as the "Chief Complaint." The patient describes the problem in his or her own words.

Follow-up Questions: OPQRST is the mnemonic used for learning about the patient’s pain complaint. Here are some of the OPQRST questions asked by the physician:

·       Onset: “Did your pain start suddenly or gradually get worse and worse?” This is also a chance to ask, “What were you doing when the pain started?”
·       Provokes or Palliates: “What makes your pain better or worse?”
·       Quality: “What words would you use to describe your pain?” or “What does your pain feel like?”
·       Radiates: “Point to where it hurts the most. Where does your pain go from there?” “Does your pain radiate?”
·       Severity: On a scale of 0 to 10 with 10 being the worst pain you've ever experienced, what number would you assign to your discomfort? 
·       Time: When did this pain start and has it changed in any way since it came on?  How long has this condition lasted? Is it similar to a past problem? If so, what was done at that time?

REVIEW OF SYSTEMS (ROS)
A ROS is an inventory of body systems obtained through a series of questions seeking to identify signs and/or symptoms which the patient may be experiencing or has experienced.
For purposes of ROS, the following systems are recognized:
• Constitutional symptoms (e.g., fever, weight loss) • Eyes
• Ears, Nose, Mouth, Throat
• Cardiovascular • Respiratory
• Gastrointestinal
• Genitourinary
• Musculoskeletal
• Integumentary (skin and/or breast) • Neurological
• Psychiatric
• Endocrine
• Hematologic/Lymphatic
• Allergic/Immunologic
PAST MEDICAL, FAMILY AND/OR SOCIAL HISTORY (PFSH)
The PMFSH consists of a review of three areas:
       past medical history (the patient's past experiences with illnesses, operations, injuries and treatments);
       family history (a review of medical events in the patient's family, including diseases which may be hereditary or place the patient at risk); and
       social history (an age appropriate review of past and current activities).
ELEMENTS OF A MUSCULOSKELETAL EXAMINATION —
Constitutional: Measurement of any three of the following seven vital signs: 1) sitting or standing blood pressure, 2) supine blood pressure, 3) pulse rate and regularity, 4) respiration,
5) temperature, 6) height, 7) weight.
General appearance of patient (eg, development, nutrition, body habitus, deformities, attention to grooming)
Cardiovascular: Examination of peripheral vascular system by observation (eg, swelling, varicosities) and palpation (eg, pulses, temperature, edema, tenderness)
Lymphatic: Palpation of lymph nodes in neck, axillae, groin and/or other location
Musculoskeletal:
Examination of gait and station
Examination of joint(s), bone(s) and muscle(s)/ tendon(s) of four of the following six areas: 1) head and neck; 2) spine, ribs and pelvis; 3) right upper extremity; 4) left upper extremity;
5) right lower extremity; and 6) left lower extremity. The examination of a given area includes:
   Inspection, percussion and/or palpation with notation of any misalignment, asymmetry, crepitation, defects, tenderness, masses or effusions
   Assessment of range of motion with notation of any pain (eg, straight leg raising), crepitation or contracture
   Assessment of stability with notation of any dislocation (luxation), subluxation or laxity
   Assessment of muscle strength and tone (eg, flaccid, cog wheel, spastic) with notation of any atrophy or abnormal movements
Skin: Inspection and/or palpation of skin and subcutaneous tissue (eg, scars, rashes, lesions, cafe- au-lait spots, ulcers) in four of the following six areas: 1) head and neck; 2) trunk; 3) right upper extremity; 4) left upper extremity; 5) right lower extremity; and 6) left lower extremity.
Neurological/ Psychiatric: Test coordination (eg, finger/nose, heel/ knee/shin, rapid alternating movements in the upper and lower extremities, evaluation of fine motor coordination in young children)
Examination of deep tendon reflexes and/or nerve stretch test with notation of pathological reflexes (eg, Babinski)
Examination of sensation (eg, by touch, pin, vibration, proprioception) Brief assessment of mental status including
   Orientation to time, place and person
   Mood and affect (eg, depression, anxiety, agitation)
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING/ASSESMENT/PLAN — Recommended level of care (duration, frequency, re-exam time frame) and Specific treatment goals.

RADIOGRAHIC IMAGING — Medically X-rays, MRI, or CT scan are not recommended for routine evaluation of patients with acute back problems within the first 4-6 weeks of symptoms unless a red flag and high index of suspicion is noted on clinical evaluation. However, Chiropractors deals with a special population of patient, this population gets manipulation. When manipulating the spine the physician needs to have imaging as a safety precaution and to rule out a more serious disease process.

IF INDICATIONS FOR REFERRAL — Referral to primary physician or other specialist is performed when needed.

SUMMARY
Back pain is the second most common symptomatic reason for medical office visits in the US. Risk factors include age, general health, occupation, lifestyle, psychosocial, and cultural factors.
Patients with low back pain should undergo a complete HPI/OPQRST, PMFS history and examination.
After the assessment/diagnoses has been made the chiropractic physician will suggest a treatment plan including recommended level of care (duration, frequency, re-exam time frame) and specific treatment goals.  

REFERENCES
1.    Jensen M, Brant-Zawadzki M, Obuchowski N, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Lumbar Spine in People Without Back Pain. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 69-116.
2.     Vallfors B. Acute, Subacute and Chronic Low Back Pain: Clinical Symptoms, Absenteeism and Working Environment. Scan J Rehab Med Suppl 1985; 11: 1-98.
6.     http://www.spine-health.com/conditions/lower-back-pain/introduction-back-pain-and-neck-pain.


Wednesday, February 12, 2014

Top 10 Chiropractic Studies of 2013


Top 10 Chiropractic Studies of 2013

Here are the top 10 chiropractic research studies of 2013.
1. Immediate Benefits of Chiropractic Visible on MRI: For the first time, researchers used MRI to document changes in spinal gapping immediately after a chiropractic adjustment.
 2. AMA Recommends Chiropractic Before Resorting to Surgery: The Journal of the American Medical Association released new guidelines for back pain treatment that encouraged patients to seek chiropractic and physical therapy before resorting to surgery.
3. Chiropractic as Effective as Epidural Injections for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Patients with lumbar disc herniation were randomly assigned to receive either nerve root  injections or chiropractic care. Overall, 76% of chiropractic patients reported feeling “better” or “much better” after treatment compared to just 62.5% of injection patients.
4. Chiropractic Lowers Blood Pressure: Hypertensive patients had reduced diastolic blood pressure readings after receiving chiropractic adjustments in a new study.
5. Chiropractic Best Option for SI Joint Pain: Chiropractic care was better than physical therapy or injections of corticosteroids for sacroiliac joint dysfunction.
6. Neck Adjustments Immediately Improve Joint Position Sense: Cervical manipulation was shown to improve joint position sense, which could assist in improving mobility in patients with neck pain.
7. Chiropractic Better than Medical Care Alone for Back Pain: Military personnel with back pain had a significantly better chance of recovery when they received a combined treatment of chiropractic and medical care, compared to those who only received medical care.
8. Spinal Adjustments Relieve Muscle Pain Instantly: Patients with myofascial pain experienced immediate improvements in pressure pain thresholds after receiving chiropractic adjustments.
9. Cervical Disc Herniation Eased by Chiropractic: A study of patients with cervical radiculopathy showed that 85% experienced significant reductions in pain and disability after receiving chiropractic care for three months.
10. Chiropractic Thaws Frozen Shoulder Syndrome: Patients had a 78% improvement in pain after receiving chiropractic care for frozen shoulder syndrome. In another study of patients treated with manipulation under anesthesia, patients had significant reductions in nighttime pain and shoulder stiffness.

Monday, February 10, 2014

Low Speed/Impact Crash means no personal Injury? Fact or Fiction?


You hear it all the time in the medicolegal community, minimal property damage so no personal injury. It was a low impact collision, barely a scratch on the vehicle. Insurance adjusters typically consider a "low impact" accident one in which there was little or no visible physical damage to the vehicle. At best, there might be a dime-sized dent in the bumper and the estimated cost of repair was under a hundred dollars. Over the years insurance companies have expanded it to $100.00, $250.00, $500.00, $1,000.00, to $2,000.00 and more. Basically, a “low impact collision” is whatever the insurance company says it is, but that’s hardly the case.  Whether a person was injured, in a "low impact" accident is always a matter of opinion the doctors, the lawyers and the patients.
The question of at what speed do you get a soft-tissue injury has always been debated.  It is complicated by human and physical variables, which are difficult to define, and even more difficult to test.  Here are some of the human and physical variables that contribute soft tissue injuries.
·      Awareness of impending crash
·      Bracing for impact
·      Sex
·      Age
·      Position in Vehicle
·      Stature

Some of the dynamic and vehicle factors that contribute to soft tissue injuries:
·      Vehicles involved
·      Speed differential
·      Vehicle weight
·      Location of impact
·      Direction of impact
·      Head restraint location
·      Seat failure
·      Seat back angle
·      Seat back height

"Low-speed" impact refers to 1-2 miles per hour and goes up to 20-25 mph. "Moderate speeds" are 25-40 mph and "high speeds" are 40 mph and over”1.  In a study by Chapline et al the largest category of injury crashes were graded as having no damage.  In these, 38% of females and 19% of males had symptoms.  When damage was rated as minor, these percentages were 54% and 34%.  This study demonstrates that injury occurs when there is no damage to the vehicle.   Brault JR et al used human volunteer crash testing to produce injuries in 29% and 38% of the participants in 2.5 m.p.h. and 5 m.p.h.  It appears that the threshold for injury, even in adult healthy volunteers under ideal laboratory conditions, may be as low as 2.5 mph”5.  
There are many studies that confirm low speed collisions with minimal damage to the vehicle cause injuryto the operator and passengers.  Research quoted by White and Panjabe states that an eight mph rear-end collision may result in a two g force acceleration of the impacted vehicle and a five g force acceleration acting on the occupant's head within 250 msec of impact. (One g equals an acceleration of approximately 32 ft./sec.) Car crashes happen in literally a blink of an eye. The point is that the head and neck experience more g forces than the car in low-speed impacts1.  Research has shown that high impact forces are transmitted directly to the occupant in low-speed impacts and that the vehicle does not begin to crush until impact speed exceeds 15 or 20 mph.1  Bumpers are made in a variety ways, ie. gas shock absorbers and polystyrene, able to withstand 8.1 to 12.4 m.p.h. resulting in less damage to the vehicle and more g force to the occupants 7,8,9,10.  Basically vehicles of today are being built to withstand more impact, but humans are not.  It is a fact that low speed/impact crashes cause personal injury to the occupants.

1.  Jeffrey Tucker, DC, DACRB, Injury with Low-Speed Collisions, Dynamic Chiropractic  May 22, 1995, Vol. 13, Issue 11.

2. States JD, Balcerak JD, Williams JS, et al.: Injury frequency and head restraint effectiveness in rear end impact accidents. In Proceedings of 16th Stapp Car Crash Conference, Detroit, MI, 228-257, 1972.

3. Chapline JF, Ferguson SA, Lillis RP, Lund AK, William AF. Neck Pain and head restraint position relative to the drivers head in rear-end collisions.  Accident Analysis and Prevention 2000; 32:287-297.

4. Brault JR, Wheeler JB, Siegmund GP, Brault EJ. Clinical response of human subjects to rear-end auto collisions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79:72-80, 1998.

5. Croft A, Whiplash Injury Threshold: New Lower Speed Defined, Dynamic Chiropractic – March 23, 1998, Vol. 16, Issue 07.

6. White AA, Panjabi MM. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine, New York, JB Lippencott, 1978, pp 153-158.

7. Romilly DP, Thomson RW, Navin FPD, Macnabb MJ: Low speed rear impacts and the elastic properties of automobiles. Proceedings: 12th International Conference of Experimental Safety Vehicles, Gothenburg, 1-14, May/June, 1989.

8. Bailey MN, King DJ, Romilly DP, Thomson RW: Characterization of automobile bumper components for low speed impacts. Proceedings: Canadian Multidisciplinary Road Safety Conference VII, Vancouver, British Columbia, 190-203, Jun, 1991.

9. Bailey MN, Wong BC, Lawrence JM: Data and methods for estimating the severity of minor impacts. SAE Tech Paper Series 950352 1339-174, 1995.

10. Szabo TJ, Welcher J: Dynamics of low speed crash tests with energy absorbing bumpers. SA 41. E Tech Paper Series 921573, 1-9, 1992.





Saturday, February 8, 2014

A Multi-Therapeutic Approach Is Needed To Treat Back Pain


The cause of back pain is often unknown, but we know when it is there.  Sometimes back pain can be sudden and sharp or insidious and dull.  One thing we know for sure is that most people will experience back pain or have experienced back pain. The causes of back pain are numerous; some are self-inflicted due to a lifetime of bad habits or job duties. Other back pain causes include accidents, muscle strains, overuse at work and sports injuries. Although the causes may be different, most often they share the same symptoms.
Back pain affects the entire nervous system and a multi-therapeutic approach is needed to obtain the best possible outcomes. As stated by Denise M. Goodman, MD, MS et al: "Many treatments are available for low back pain. Often exercises and physical therapy can help. Some people benefit from chiropractic therapy or acupuncture.  Sometimes medications are needed, including analgesics (painkillers) or medications that reduce inflammation. Surgery is not usually needed but may be considered if other therapies have failed."
What is the nervous system? If you think of the brain as a central computer that controls all bodily functions, then the nervous system is like a network that relays messages back and forth from the brain to different parts of the body. It does this via the spinal cord, which runs from the brain down through the back and contains threadlike nerves that branch out to every organ and body part.  So, if someone touches your back or if your  hand touches something hot, you jerk away. Just like a built-in alarm system, this system of nerves will alert the body to danger and trigger automatic protective responses.
Pain itself often modifies the way the central nervous system works, so that it actually becomes more sensitive and gets more pain with less stimulation. That sensitization is called “central sensitization” because it involves changes in the central nervous system (CNS) in particular — the brain and the spinal cord.  In this sensitized state, the peripheral and/or central nervous system will have many false alarms that are triggered by normally non-threatening activities like walking, sitting, standing, talking, breathing, and moving.  This disrupted pain response has been documented in patients with musculoskeletal disorders like back pain, fibromyalgia, and whiplash.

Sometimes pain receptors(nerves) kick into overdrive, and like an alarm system that never turns off, they continue sending pain signals to the brain. This results is a highly-sensitized nervous system that is quick to react at the slightest sign of a threat.
Central sensitization helps to explain widespread chronic pain after an auto collision, or seemingly random flare-ups in chronic pain in patients with fibromyalgia.
Research suggests that back pain can have significant affect on the health of the central nervous system. A new studies results showed that individuals with CLBP(Chronic Low Back Pain) have lower PPT(Pressuer Pain Threshold) values than healthy individuals. The research study consisted of forty participants: 20 with a clinical diagnosis of CLBP and 20 healthy individuals. The outcome measures were PPT values of myotomes, sclerotomes, and dermatomes corresponding to segments L1 to S3; demographic, clinic, and social data; visual analogue scale, and Roland and Morris Questionnaire.
Another study in Arthritis Rhuem in 2004 demonstrated At equal levels of PPT, patients with CLBP or fibromyalgia experienced significantly more pain and showed more extensive nerve activation in pain-related areas.  Chiropractic care can help to calm these chronic pain flare-ups, and correct any spinal dysfunctions that could be contributing or causing your symptoms. A 2012 study suggested that chiropractic patients receiving spinal manipulative therapy was more effective than medication in both the short and long term.  Chiropractic at the Pain Relief Centre consists of a multi-therapy approach as suggested by Gert Bronfort: "From other systematic reviews of different treatments for chronic low back pain, it has become evident that anyone of the viable mono-therapeutic options like spinal manipulative therapy offers at best a modest benefit by itself. Given the multi-factorial nature of back pain, it is not likely that a single therapeutic approach will be the best strategy for the majority of patients because of the limited understanding of the underlying aetiology and mediating effects of different bio-psychosocial variables."  The Pain Relief Centre uses a multidisciplinary approach to treating back pain.  This approach includes chiropractic, massage, physical therapy, and medication as suggested by the research.

1. Imamura M, et al. Changes in pressure pain threshold in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Spine 2013; 38(24):2098-107. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000435027.50317.d7.   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24026153
2. Giesecke T et al. Evidence of augmented central pain processing in idiopathic chronic low back pain. Arthritis Rhuem 2004 Feb;50(2):613-23.  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14872506
3. Lasich, Christina. What is Central Sensitization-Symptoms- Chronic Pain. Health Central July 12, 2010. 
4. Gert Bronfort, DC, PhD et al.  Spinal Manipulation, Medication, or Home Exercise With Advice for Acute and Subacute Neck Pain: A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(1_Part_1):1-10. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-156-1-201201030-00002. http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=1033256.
5. Gert Bronfort, DC PhD, High-quality Evidence That Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain Has a Small, Short-term Greater Effect on Pain and Functional Status Compared With Other Interventions. Evid Based Med. 2012;17(3):81-82. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/765921.
6. Denise M. Goodman, MD, MS; Alison E. Burke, MA; Edward H. Livingston, MD. Low Back Pain
JAMA. 2013;309(16):1738. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.3046. http://jama.jamanetwork.com/journal.aspx
7. Marissa Luck, Back Pain Affects Entire Nervous System. Chironexus News January 29, 2014. http://www.chironexus.net/2014/01/back-pain-affects-entire-nervous-system/